Through the Pools tab, users are able to view, modify and manage existing storage pools. After it breached 1ms, the throughput continued to rise up to From here, you can see if hosts have proper mapping setup, or quickly share or modify a mapped LUN. All of these tests leverage the common vdBench workload generator, with a scripting engine to automate and capture results over a large compute testing cluster. They have been removed out of operation due to standard IT asset change overs. They have space for 12x 3.
|Date Added:||28 December 2012|
|File Size:||30.27 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In our application workloads, we saw fantastic performance. But today, the cost profile isn’t there yet and businesses with more modest needs shouldn’t worry about being all flash, as the HPE MSA delivers a highly capable, functional and cost-effective solution.
It should be noted that HPE doesn’t officially support mobile browsers for MSA management, but most functionality worked well in our testing regardless. Across the board, the array offered exceptional low-latency performance, and in all areas offered strong sub-1ms latency with a broad usable throughput band.
This is the chassis and power supplies only. In terms of read bandwidth, it peaked out at 1.
HPE MSA 2052 SAN Storage Review
Around the back of the unit, the two controllers are stacked in the middle, flanked on either side by power supplies. Additional SSDs add a significant scsii to the overall purchase price of the array. Behind the HPE bezel sit the 24 drive carriers.
While not a perfect representation of actual workloads, synthetic eevice do help to baseline storage devices with a repeatability factor that makes it easy to do apples-to-apples comparison between competing solutions. Through the Pools tab, users are able to view, modify and manage existing storage pools.
Tintri releases TGC 4.
HPE MSA SAN Storage Review | – Storage Reviews
OS is not installed. HP Lefthand P G2 7. These chassis’ are tested and in excellent condition. The MSA easily hits on both fronts, while also being affordable. These stickers are designed to break if removed or tampered with.
These systems take 24x 2. Should an MSA owner decide to add flash later, the process is as straightforward as adding the drives to the system and enabling caching or tiering after an appropriate license is applied.
All of these tests leverage the common vdBench workload generator, with a scripting engine to automate and capture results over a large compute testing cluster. Buying format see all. More refinements More refinements All testing was performed over 16Gb FC, two ports per controller.
When it comes to benchmarking storage arrays, application testing is best, and synthetic testing comes in second place. This array has been tested and reset to defaults. cojtroller
Slight signs of wear, overall very good condition. Tested by onsite technicians and in full working order. Show only see all. Samsung ZET Review. Users are able to select which pool the storage is located inside of, as well as a preference to which storage tier the data should reside.
Although, as many of our readers understand, synthetic performance data only shows part of the story. In either case, the entire process is automated, MSA does all the work as workloads change, and no management or thought by the end user is required to take advantage of these features. One day flash will take over, even in entry arrays targeted for the SMB.
To put this in perspective, this entry-priced array offered higher performance out of arrya gate than two of our recently reviewed all-flash arrays. Built on Microsoft Windows Storage Server or R2, depending on model, you can provide users with a highly available solution so that their data is ready when they need it.